he was warned twice and then got a slap on the wrist after he did it again after saying he wouldn't.
edit: and yes actually, saying you're "an engineer" in an email to the state traffic board _is_ claiming a PE when you don't have one.
has his website changed? It doesn't say professional engineer anywhere on it.
particularly advertisement of services as an expert witness, etc, all are problematic under oregon law. In particular, you cannot be an expert witness without being a PE.
They go into this in the complaint PDF with relevant sections of law, etc.
> They go into this in the complaint PDF with relevant sections of law, etc.
None of the quoted regulations in the complaint mention being an expert witness or even use either of those words.
If the state board has a legitimate complaint about the language used on his web site, they shouldn't undermine their own authority by also bringing up bullshit complaints about doing math without a license. It makes the state board look like they've got a vendetta against the guy.
Which is not what they are complaining about. They are complaining about him presenting himself as an engineer, which is something he did, and shouldn't have done in Oregon. They gave him a warning about it, and he continued doing it. That wasn't smart on his part.
Also for whatever it is worth, I've now worked in mechanical engineering for 5 years and software for about 1 year, and they both feel the same to me. Software is sometimes faster and sloppier, but I think that's just because the build process for a program takes minutes and the build process for the CVD machines I used to design takes months.
I certainly don't favor the idea that every software engineer/consulting engineer/etc. should have to get a PE before they can call themselves by that title.
You're welcome to feel differently but don't expect a lot of support.
PEs are mostly about certifications needed to sign off on things in some cases. I got an Engineer-in-Training certificate but never had the need to get a PE.
That's not how facts work.
Obviously not an engineer.
"Software Engineers" have Engineering degrees.
Example is University of Waterloo Software Engineering: https://uwaterloo.ca/find-out-more/programs/software-enginee...
tl;dr: he was fined, correctly, for claiming a professional licensure and authority to which he's not entitled. Not for "using math".
professional engineers are real in the same way board-licensed specialists or bar-admitted lawyers are, and you can't claim to be one unless you are one. end of story.