News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:On emotional authenticity and masking as an autistic person by ColinWright on Saturday April 29, 2017 @12:41PM (#14227363)
Here is my understanding, after some extensive conversations with people in the same situation as the author.

In English one refers to a male as "him" and a female as "her". However, some people identify as "non-binary", which means that in their own internal self they so not feel that they are entirely male, or entirely female. As a result, they find it not quite right to be referred to as "him", but also not quite right to be referred to as "her".

So they prefer to be referred to in the gender-neutral "them".

If you are "traditionally aligned", if your personal self-identity matches the body your ghost[0] inhabits, this can be totally mystifying. Personally, I've come to accept that people are weird, and if someone says they want to be referred to as "they" and "them" then why not?

[0] "You are a ghost driving a meat covered skeleton made from stardust[1] riding a rock floating through space."

[1] Or nuclear waste - take your pick.

Edit: To the people downvoting this, it was intended to be a factual answer to a direct and reasonable question. I have no idea why you think this comment is inappropriate and deserves a downvote.

Re:On emotional authenticity and masking as an autistic person by badosu on Saturday April 29, 2017 @12:46PM (#14227399)
That must feel terrible...

Is this common? Never heard of it.

Re:On emotional authenticity and masking as an autistic person by ColinWright on Saturday April 29, 2017 @12:54PM (#14227448)
I have no personal experience of it, but I know people who have. As a result I've read a bit about it. It seems that people in these circumstances can be content with who they are, but the external pressures from society can be overwhelmingly unbearable.

I don't know how common it is, but you can look up the terms "non-binary" and "transgender" and find out more.

Again, personally, I think we should just let people get on with being who they are. Respect them for who they are and the work they do, and just stay the hell out of their personal lives. No business of mine.

Re:On emotional authenticity and masking as an autistic person by badosu on Saturday April 29, 2017 @12:55PM (#14227452)
Thanks for the thoughts!
Re:On emotional authenticity and masking as an autistic person by gcr on Saturday April 29, 2017 @02:15PM (#14227863)
In the spaces I frequent, it's becoming more common to introduce onesself by also introducing your preferred gender pronoun. "Hey, I'm Danielle, they/them." "Hi, I'm Mike, he/him." "Hi, I'm Sarah, she/her."

I like doing this because it's one small, simple way of welcoming those who might not otherwise feel accepted.

Re:On emotional authenticity and masking as an autistic person by khedoros1 on Saturday April 29, 2017 @05:24PM (#14228837)
I haven't met anyone that has said that they consider themselves "non-binary", "transsexual", "transgender", or any of the other subtly different labels that they could use, but part of the current zeitgeist, especially within socially liberal-leaning circles, is to spread awareness of how diverse human sexuality is.

I don't think that there are really solid numbers for how different people identify themselves. The information would have to be self-reported, and since there would still be some social stigma attached in many places, I doubt that a survey would end up being very accurate.

Re:On emotional authenticity and masking as an autistic person by pepve on Saturday April 29, 2017 @07:55PM (#14229457)
I think you mean gender instead of sexuality. Gender is who you are, sexuality is who you like. (I'm replying to try to help, not to nitpick.)
Re:On emotional authenticity and masking as an autistic person by khedoros1 on Saturday April 29, 2017 @11:28PM (#14230032)
I think that I meant both, and only wrote one.
Re:On emotional authenticity and masking as an autistic person by oh_sigh on Saturday April 29, 2017 @01:32PM (#14227668)
It's extremely common on parts of the internet but extremely rare in normal life
Re:On emotional authenticity and masking as an autistic person by lkbm on Monday May 01, 2017 @10:58AM (#14237983)
I feel like we would've said that about gay people thirty years ago if we'd had the Internet we do today. ' I live with one person who uses "they/them" and have lived with three others, one of whom identified as transgendered (as opposed to "gender queer). At the high school I worked at, we typically had a transgendered population of 1%-5%, but no one who used they/them--just one who used he/him/his and several that used she/her/hers. I think I've known more transgendered people than I've known CMU, Harvard, Stanford, and MIT grads combined, despite working in a tech startup and being the son of two CMU grads.

Yes, it's rare, but not as rare as graduating from Harvard, and it's definitely not just an Internet phenomenon. There are just a lot of areas where they don't feel welcome. They're real people in real life and they tend to congregate in places where they'll be treated as such. Right now that includes sections of the Internet, but also quite a few real life enclaves.

Re:On emotional authenticity and masking as an autistic person by oh_sigh on Monday May 01, 2017 @04:22PM (#14241175)
I agree with you, but Only a small subset of transgendered people want their pronouns to be they/their
Re:On emotional authenticity and masking as an autistic person by namaemuta on Saturday April 29, 2017 @01:43PM (#14227715)
Tumblr principally.
Re:On emotional authenticity and masking as an autistic person by ddorian43 on Saturday April 29, 2017 @01:58PM (#14227777)
Why not 'it' ?
Re:On emotional authenticity and masking as an autistic person by ColinWright on Saturday April 29, 2017 @02:05PM (#14227803)
Again, by my understanding, the pronoun "it" carries the baggage of non-person-ness. "It" is used for things, not people. I'm happy to be corrected on this by people with personal experience.