Re:The Boring Company [video]
by placeybordeaux on Friday April 28, 2017 @06:05PM
(#14223516)
We'll have to look seriously at living underground on mars. It won't protect us from solar rays on the surface. One of the cheaper ways to protect yourself is to put a layer of rock inbetween you and the sun.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Boring Company [video]
by BurningFrog on Friday April 28, 2017 @06:30PM
(#14223675)
Is the main radiation danger the Sun or the background "cosmic" radiation?
I've been assuming the latter, but I realize now that I don't actually know.
Both are significant dangers, but radiation from the sun can be shielded fairly easily. Not so high energy cosmic rays.
Re:The Boring Company [video]
by BurningFrog on Friday April 28, 2017 @09:48PM
(#14224559)
You can for example put an entire planet between you and the sun radiation by going out at night.
Doesn't matter too much for the rocks: if a few metre of rock won't absorb the radiation, neither will your body.
That doesn't make too much sense to me, since your body could be harmed by absorbing only a fraction of the energy of a large radiation dose.
Valid point. Though I think given the spectra involved, it probably doesn't apply.
Underground living on Mercury is much more interesting than Mars. (There's a band close to the poles and a few meters down that has very stable and comfortable temperatures.
Perhaps if you're building a cellar. If you want to make a 10-story building - even in a virgin terrain, it's a complicated operation.
Not to mention that you need to make the materials such that they resist a huge side pressure, water leaks and so on.
Psychological costs are also costs.
Water leaks are not going to be a problem on mars. Significantly lower gravity 3.711 m/s vs 9.8m/s also drastically lowers pressure from burrowing.
Re:The Boring Company [video]
by clock_tower on Friday April 28, 2017 @06:21PM
(#14223632)
Wide-open spaces, even enclosed ones, can reduce the psychological burden of confinement quite a bit -- there's a variety of Russian strategic-missile submarine with a swimming pool, for example. This subject also comes up frequently in SF (science fiction, not San Francisco, which has the opposite problem); there was some discussion of it on the "Atomic Rocket" worldbuilding guide, IIRC.
Re:The Boring Company [video]
by lambdadmitry on Saturday April 29, 2017 @07:07PM
(#14229262)
I… I think the picture of that "pool" in your head is slightly wrong [1].
Tangential: the source [2] is pretty interesting.
Re:The Boring Company [video]
by ChefDenominator on Friday April 28, 2017 @06:19PM
(#14223618)
Why build layers at all? Urban concentrations too high?
Is it possible to make a huge nuclear explosion/reaction that produces the same atmosphere we have on earth?
Re:The Boring Company [video]
by placeybordeaux on Friday April 28, 2017 @07:35PM
(#14224047)
There are ways to teraform the planet, but they are well beyond our capabilities.
No?
Wrong grammar. I was actually asking a question.
how to become ant people
Re:The Boring Company [video]
by infiniteparamtr on Friday April 28, 2017 @08:01PM
(#14224156)
Human evolution would surely change direction after a few millenia of living underground in lower gravity