News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Spellfucker by jwilk on Friday April 28, 2017 @05:31AM (#14218035)
uidaut = without

łud = would

Re:Spellfucker by chx on Friday April 28, 2017 @03:49PM (#14222527)
Lávly konszept. Ju kud ívön tráj úzing en ívön mór disztant lengvidzs, Hángérien det iz. Áj wándör háu mács of disz iz komprihenziböl tu ádörz :D
Re:Spellfucker by jwilk on Friday April 28, 2017 @05:25PM (#14223181)
Your digraphs and trigraphs make my head hurt...

Translation: Lovely concept. You could even try using an even more distant language, Hungarian that is. I wonder how much of this is comprehensible to others.

Re:Spellfucker by chx on Friday April 28, 2017 @09:01PM (#14224371)
Nicely done! So it works. I badly want to see the software, however, which can do the same translation.
Re:Spellfucker by igorpavlov on Friday April 28, 2017 @04:07PM (#14222648)
I find the comparison with Slavic languages quite funny :) Just keep in mind, simple transliteration is easily reversible. Spellfucker - not.
Re:Spellfucker by chx on Friday April 28, 2017 @09:08PM (#14224395)
It's not a straight transliteration -- it's not like we are writing IPA phonetic marks by-the-by in two different languages. For example your "th" in "thing" doesn't exist in Hungarian so I will use "sz" which by the way is one of the common pronunciation mistakes we make: replacing /θ/ with /s/. There are sounds in Hungarian which do not exist in English and yet if I wanted to "encode" the word "duke" I would likely use "gyúk" thus replacing /djuːk/ with /ɟu:k/.