News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Write Fast Apps Using Async Python 3.6 and Redis by bobbyi_settv on Thursday April 27, 2017 @04:49PM (#14214572)
You normally use something like redis to store the state.

If you were going to share state in memory between threads, how would you handle the case where the second request goes to a different server or that the process has restarted? You'd need redis anyway, so you might as well just use it in all cases.

Re:Write Fast Apps Using Async Python 3.6 and Redis by Waterluvian on Thursday April 27, 2017 @06:36PM (#14215389)
I get that everyone's responses are thinking some big public thing. I'm thinking small toy implementation for my home network.

The toy experiment is how to do what's trivial in Node with Python. Mainly because I like working with python. I think the answer might be: Python is the wrong tool for the job.

Re:Write Fast Apps Using Async Python 3.6 and Redis by rcarmo on Thursday April 27, 2017 @06:46PM (#14215457)
Erm, no. You can do shared thread storage, in Python, it's just that it doesn't really scale. I've done it for small daemons without significant hassle, and even wrote my own Go-like CSP helper: https://github.com/rcarmo/python-utils/blob/master/taskkit.p...
Re:Write Fast Apps Using Async Python 3.6 and Redis by zeptomu on Thursday April 27, 2017 @07:03PM (#14215581)
The problem is that accessing shared state concurrently in a multi-process context is a non-trivial problem, so specific software emerged that handles these problems for you.

The simplest solution is to use a small DB system like sqlite. It is built into Python (import sqlite3) performs reasonably well and you do not have to run an additional service.

Now if a small DB like sqlite already feels overblown to you (and it really is simple and small) you might not need concurrent access either, so the simplest solution is to just use a file where you store your state.

Re:Write Fast Apps Using Async Python 3.6 and Redis by icebraining on Thursday April 27, 2017 @07:36PM (#14215762)
I'd say the simplest solution is a global (or just shared) variable using a thread-safe container like queue.Queue. There's also multiprocessing.Queue, which supports sharing the queue across multiple workers.
Re:Write Fast Apps Using Async Python 3.6 and Redis by bpicolo on Thursday April 27, 2017 @07:09PM (#14215612)
Having multiple nodejs processes is the same thing as having multiple python processes w/ regards to sharing state.

What you're referring to works equally well in the single-process case for both.

Re:Write Fast Apps Using Async Python 3.6 and Redis by rbutcher on Thursday April 27, 2017 @07:42PM (#14215787)
This maybe seems complicated because Node has 1 obvious way to run (single threaded with asynchronous functions) but Python has a few ways (single threaded, multithreaded, ioloops kind of like Node, greenlets).

Python is excellent for toy implementations, and real ones too in many cases.

Re:Write Fast Apps Using Async Python 3.6 and Redis by netheril96 on Friday April 28, 2017 @01:58AM (#14217142)
Is multithreading really necessary for a toy?
Re:Write Fast Apps Using Async Python 3.6 and Redis by mkj on Friday April 28, 2017 @02:42AM (#14217318)
It probably is for long-polling or websockets?

https://github.com/mkj/wort-templog/blob/master/web/templog.... is my not-quite-toy example - a single process runs from uwsgi with Bottle (like Flask) and gevent. The long polling waits on a global Event variable that's updated by another request, nice and simple.