Re:Alphabet's Self-Driving Cars to Get Their First Real Riders
by jimlawruk on Tuesday April 25, 2017 @12:44PM
(#14195345)
More importantly, while you are at work, it pick ups other riders. Which is why people won't need to buy these cars.
Re:Alphabet's Self-Driving Cars to Get Their First Real Riders
by Neliquat on Tuesday April 25, 2017 @01:46PM
(#14196147)
If I bought my own car, I dont want it picking up random people. Then its just public transport, vomit and all, funded by me.
Re:Alphabet's Self-Driving Cars to Get Their First Real Riders
by ghaff on Tuesday April 25, 2017 @04:06PM
(#14197491)
Even if vomit isn't a common occurrence, there's wear and tear and empty soda cans and it means you can't leave stuff in your car.
The broader issue is that, if this sort of thing were to become commonplace someday, why wouldn't it just become a race to the bottom where your income/mile =~ operating costs per mile. (Or, even more likely as with Uber today for many people, operating costs per mile as calculated by a lot of people who don't really understand their full operating costs.)
Maybe fewer people will buy cars and more will use robo-taxis. But loaning out your car to compete against fleet operations does not sound like it would ever be a good deal.
Couldn't this be solved as easily as you car telling you that while you're at work it will head over to the repair shop to get its sensors checked up?