News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Setting Up HTTP(S) Load Balancing – WebSocket proxy support by stephenr on Tuesday April 25, 2017 @10:16AM (#14193695)
> that's not a big deal

So surely it wouldn't take that long then?

> there are better things to spend time on

Like putting CDN's in front of your load balancers I guess?

A TLS terminating proxy that doesn't support SNI in 2017 is like a browser that doesn't support SNI in 2017.

Re:Setting Up HTTP(S) Load Balancing – WebSocket proxy support by manigandham on Tuesday April 25, 2017 @02:11PM (#14196401)
You're just being flippant at this point but here goes:

You will never achieve the same reliability, scalability, performance, and security, at the same cost, by doing it yourself. And it's fine to layer 2 services together to get all the functionality needed. That's completely normal - like how you can use multiple APIs to build an app - unless you have a specific scenario, like security regulations, to avoid a managed solution.

Maybe building all that means you're a "hacker" but most users are acting on behalf of businesses and there are far better things to spend time on than creating a worse solution to a solved problem.