News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:HipChat security notice by jordache on Monday April 24, 2017 @04:57PM (#14188229)
no.. but I could be a non IT user using hipchat. This sentence is likely meaningless to me.
Re:HipChat security notice by detaro on Monday April 24, 2017 @05:35PM (#14188546)
Is that a problem? I guess they could have put a "technical details:" in front of it, to make that clearer, but it has to be in that e-mail (otherwise the techies complain) and isn't really something they can explain in a useful way there.
Re:HipChat security notice by plange on Monday April 24, 2017 @04:58PM (#14188243)
Then you would be fine with the standard boilerplate "your data is secure with us"?

I'm happy they say this.. now i'd like some sort of proof :-)

Re:HipChat security notice by jordache on Monday April 24, 2017 @06:29PM (#14188995)
A follow up sentence that re-iterates the same sentiment in non technical term will accommodate none technical recipients.

Poor UX is my point of this

Re:HipChat security notice by ams6110 on Monday April 24, 2017 @07:46PM (#14189525)
Better would be "We securely[1] store your passwords"

blah blah...We take your privacy very seriously...blah blah...

[1] Technically, we use bcrypt with a random salt.

Re:HipChat security notice by balls187 on Tuesday April 25, 2017 @12:28PM (#14195120)
An argument could be made to take this a step further and not even go into buzzword details at all, and leave it with boilerplate words.

Security is hard. Describing security is even harder.

I'm for transparency in security for review, but you can achieve the same via a 3rd party audit.

Just my 2c.

Re:HipChat security notice by bjoernw on Monday April 24, 2017 @04:59PM (#14188247)
Googling bcrypt should do the trick and most people know how to do that. </sarcasm>
Re:HipChat security notice by jordache on Monday April 24, 2017 @05:06PM (#14188298)
you're joking I assume. If not, don't be in the UX field
Re:HipChat security notice by balls187 on Monday April 24, 2017 @04:58PM (#14188240)
Sure. I get your point. Just asking if YOU specifically needed the explanation, which I'm sure a number of folks would be happy to provide.