We Just Breached the 410 PPM Threshold for CO2

Re:We Just Breached the 410 PPM Threshold for CO2 by bhickey on Saturday April 22, 2017 @07:37PM (#14175518)

And carbon taxes as reducing regulation.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We Just Breached the 410 PPM Threshold for CO2 by IanCal on Sunday April 23, 2017 @04:12AM (#14177112)

Carbon taxes are also cutting subsidies.

Given the external costs, big users are being subsidised by everyone else.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We Just Breached the 410 PPM Threshold for CO2 by Turing_Machine on Sunday April 23, 2017 @06:22PM (#14180748)

Also, war is peace, ignorance is strength, and freedom is slavery.

Good luck with that.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We Just Breached the 410 PPM Threshold for CO2 by alphapapa on Saturday April 22, 2017 @08:33PM (#14175732)

How are you going to spin that?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We Just Breached the 410 PPM Threshold for CO2 by losteric on Saturday April 22, 2017 @09:28PM (#14175897)

It's a strategic regulation that replaces multiple tactical regulations. Therefore, carbon tax leads to fewer regulations.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We Just Breached the 410 PPM Threshold for CO2 by alphapapa on Saturday April 22, 2017 @09:54PM (#14175999)

Which regulations does it replace?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We Just Breached the 410 PPM Threshold for CO2 by omegaworks on Saturday April 22, 2017 @10:11PM (#14176053)

Cap and trade, in California, at least. https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckdevore/2017/03/02/californ...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We Just Breached the 410 PPM Threshold for CO2 by losteric on Saturday April 22, 2017 @11:10PM (#14176251)

Depending on how far it's taken, the carbon tax could replace every other regulation of carbon-based green house gas emissions.

However, our contemporary Republican part uses "anti-regulations" as code for "anti-government, anti-law enforcement", so I doubt carbon tax will get any play.

[ Parent | on HN ]