News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on JavaScript performance, WebAssembly, and Shared Memory in Microsoft Edge. Parent comment

Re:JavaScript performance, WebAssembly, and Shared Memory in... by jordigh on Thursday April 20, 2017 @03:52PM (#14160219)
I suppose Firefox is ancient too. They use Mercurial canonically. :-(
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:JavaScript performance, WebAssembly, and Shared Memory in... by ergo14 on Thursday April 20, 2017 @03:58PM (#14160273)
So does Facebook... My company also uses mercurial - I know plenty of people that prefer it over git - but there is no github equivalent for it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:JavaScript performance, WebAssembly, and Shared Memory in... by ori_b on Thursday April 20, 2017 @04:11PM (#14160382)
There's bitbucket. It also has free private repositories.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:JavaScript performance, WebAssembly, and Shared Memory in... by ergo14 on Friday April 21, 2017 @11:12AM (#14166264)
It never reached the mass that github has unfortunately.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:JavaScript performance, WebAssembly, and Shared Memory in... by ori_b on Friday April 21, 2017 @03:42PM (#14168760)
Why does that prevent you from using it?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:JavaScript performance, WebAssembly, and Shared Memory in... by ergo14 on Monday April 24, 2017 @07:25AM (#14183379)
For personal and company sources we use RhodeCode - so we have both Git and mercurial. I was mentioning github because it is the closest thing to social network for open source.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:JavaScript performance, WebAssembly, and Shared Memory in... by paulddraper on Thursday April 20, 2017 @10:26PM (#14162670)
Well obviously you should just be using Chrome.
[ Parent | on HN ]