Re:Analysis of the United Airlines passenger removal incident
by tyingq on Thursday April 20, 2017 @08:10AM
(#14155914)
I'm pretty sure that "per hour" is "block hours", such that they are paid only when the door shuts.
So there's a fair amount of waiting around that's uncompensated. There is a per-diem, but I don't think it goes beyond average cost for meals, lodging, etc.
Re:Analysis of the United Airlines passenger removal incident
by maxerickson on Thursday April 20, 2017 @08:13AM
(#14155935)
Their actual typical monthly hours would be more informative than their contractual guarantee.
Re:Analysis of the United Airlines passenger removal incident
by cjrp on Thursday April 20, 2017 @08:19AM
(#14155963)
Looks like the actual total at Mesa (including per diems, etc.) was $20,183 last year[1].
[1] https://www.alpa.org/news-and-events/news-room/2016-08-16-st...
Re:Analysis of the United Airlines passenger removal incident
by maxerickson on Thursday April 20, 2017 @08:36AM
(#14156062)
It says on that chart that they did the same thing as your above comment, multiplying the guaranteed hours by the minimum hourly wage.
It could well be that they all work the minimum hours. I doubt it, this would be more expensive for the airline.
But hey, supply and demand. They wouldn't be able to pay so little if pilots weren't applying, and that won't change anytime soon because flying at a regional for a few years is a way to build hours and move on up to the mainline airline.