Why 1866 Set the Stage for Two World Wars

Re:Why 1866 Set the Stage for Two World Wars by neaden on Wednesday April 19, 2017 @03:44PM (#14151079)

Are you serious? Invading a neutral country, burning the the entire village of Louvain, executing 6,000 civilians in reprisal strikes were all things Germany was forced into doing? Belgium actively tried to German soldiers because they were being invaded! That's a reasonable response to being invaded! I have no idea how you can write something like this.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why 1866 Set the Stage for Two World Wars by pharrington on Wednesday April 19, 2017 @04:23PM (#14151413)

in which you learned why war is hell

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why 1866 Set the Stage for Two World Wars by llukas on Wednesday April 19, 2017 @03:51PM (#14151131)

What Germans did in Belgium is inexcusable.

However, knowing what Belgians did in Africa in XIX/XX century I do not have much pity for them.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why 1866 Set the Stage for Two World Wars by thinkmilitant on Wednesday April 19, 2017 @04:13PM (#14151333)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why 1866 Set the Stage for Two World Wars by llukas on Wednesday April 19, 2017 @05:29PM (#14151966)

Doesn't apply here. You seem to think otherwise - why?

I explicitly say that what Germans did is inexcusable.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why 1866 Set the Stage for Two World Wars by neaden on Wednesday April 19, 2017 @04:02PM (#14151245)

There is definately a legitamate argument that WW1/2 were essentially the West using the lessons they learned from colonialism on each other. This is pretty explicit in WW2 with Hitler's plan to ethnically cleanse and colonize Eastern Europe. At the same time, the horrible atrocities Belgium committed in the Congo don't make the murder of civilians any more inexcusable.

[ Parent | on HN ]