Re:Vanguard Is Growing Faster Than Everybody Else Combined
by jackcosgrove on Wednesday April 19, 2017 @12:31PM
(#14149033)
Active and passive are just marketing labels. The frequency of trades should be correlated with the expense ratio. If you do more trades, you better be hiring more analysts to figure out those trades.
Vanguard has lower costs because it employs fewer people to execute fewer trades. That's all I really care about.
Re:Vanguard Is Growing Faster Than Everybody Else Combined
by jessriedel on Wednesday April 19, 2017 @02:55PM
(#14150650)
Expense ratios for actively managed funds aren't that tied to trading frequency, I don't think. Most of the cost goes to paying for research, and that can be for positions held on all time scales. Someone picking a handful of blue chip stocks based on fundamentals is still definitely "active investing" even if they buy and hold for a long time.
Re:Vanguard Is Growing Faster Than Everybody Else Combined
by kgwgk on Wednesday April 19, 2017 @02:53PM
(#14150626)
Vanguard offers a range of products. Some do really hold the stocks in the benchmark. "Vanguard S&P 500 ETF is an exchange-traded share class of Vanguard 500 Index Fund. Using full replication, the portfolio holds all stocks in the same capitalization weighting as the index."
Vanguard is not nearly as active is most mutual funds, but they are not entirely passive either.