Re:Steve Ballmer serves up a data trove about government spe...
by jnty on Tuesday April 18, 2017 @10:40AM
(#14139166)
What's special about individuals who happen to be employed in the public sector or in receipt of welfare payments that makes it OK to intrude on their privacy in this way?
Re:Steve Ballmer serves up a data trove about government spe...
by barking on Tuesday April 18, 2017 @11:56AM
(#14139879)
Like jumpcrisscross said.
Ideally, where every euro of taxpayers' money goes should be a matter of public record.
Re:Steve Ballmer serves up a data trove about government spe...
by jnty on Tuesday April 18, 2017 @12:37PM
(#14140272)
I doubt that that's what you actually think. For example, I doubt you want me to be able to ask the government how much money was spent on impotence medication for you. There's a trade-off to be made regarding personal privacy. Why do you think that trade-off should be made against certain groups of people?
Re:Steve Ballmer serves up a data trove about government spe...
by Forbo on Tuesday April 18, 2017 @03:33PM
(#14142115)
You can have transparency and privacy, they are not mutually exclusive in this case. Government spent X amount of money on Y number of prescriptions for medication Z. You can determine if there needs to be further auditing if Y exceeds the projected number of prescriptions based on prevalence of conditions.
Re:Steve Ballmer serves up a data trove about government spe...
by JumpCrisscross on Tuesday April 18, 2017 @11:14AM
(#14139491)
Precisely that they are paid by the taxpayers?
Re:Steve Ballmer serves up a data trove about government spe...
by optimuspaul on Tuesday April 18, 2017 @11:30AM
(#14139656)
Why do you think taxpayers are a group capable of deciding whether tax money is being wasted?
Being able to see who spent what, where and how is probably the greatest way to ensure tax money isn't wasted.