News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Intel Pulls Out of OpenStack Effort It Founded with Racks... by foobiekr on Monday April 17, 2017 @02:11PM (#14133109)
The use case I described - Skyport's cloud managed secure servers - needs super high quality, self-recovering embedded code that made no assumptions about the network being high quality or reliable.

I think the thing people - and especially the OpenStack guys - don't appreciate is how terrible it is to (a) lose a workload or (b) require someone visit the datacenter (which may actually be a colo in another state or hours drive away). Having to fall back to some sort of terrible insecure management like IPMI or a dedicated mandatory management network (of questionable security), etc. is just not viable.

Systems and infrastructure architectures need to address a few things that really matter - error handling, continuous self monitoring, state compression and linear, systematic self-recovery - and while some OpenStack components handle this (ceph is pretty great except for a few things around access control and security) the whole doesn't handle them well at all. It's not enough to log a message (or worse, just log an exception stack).

Re:Intel Pulls Out of OpenStack Effort It Founded with Racks... by traf68 on Tuesday April 18, 2017 @11:07AM (#14139425)
I find your expectations to be unreasonably high. The self correcting system is a fiction and will always be a fiction. The indefatigable infrastructure that corrects the errant member system with 5 9s is a fiction and will always be a fiction.
Re:Intel Pulls Out of OpenStack Effort It Founded with Racks... by foobiekr on Tuesday April 18, 2017 @05:51PM (#14143298)
It is a fiction but the answer is not to throw your hands up and ignore the problem.