News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Hotel Industry’s Plan to Combat Airbnb by YCode on Monday April 17, 2017 @09:59AM (#14130887)
Before I even opened the article I knew it was going to be a legislative rather than customer-focused approach.

God forbid hotels recognize their inherent strengths and AirBnB's weaknesses and cater their services/marketing to that end.

Re:The Hotel Industry’s Plan to Combat Airbnb by ape4 on Monday April 17, 2017 @10:03AM (#14130920)
Hotels have lots of advantages. Often better location: downtown. A 24-hour desk. You can ask for info. Get deliveries. They can give you extra soap if you run out... without emailing some guy. Ask them to get you a taxi (yes I know about Uber), etc.
Re:The Hotel Industry’s Plan to Combat Airbnb by SilasX on Monday April 17, 2017 @01:28PM (#14132755)
I know it's going to be controversial but I learned this the hard way. I don't travel a lot but just did a Europe tour over 4 Airbnbs with a friend.

All four had some key distribution problem that required talking to the host, who was not always reachable. (Oh, you just enter this code ... nope, doesn't work.) They also usually only have one spare set of keys so if we wanted to return at different times, no luck. One host wanted the late check-in fee paid in cash and wouldn't issue a receipt for it, even a PM/text with "yeah, got your $X late fee". (reported)

Re:The Hotel Industry’s Plan to Combat Airbnb by neuland on Monday April 17, 2017 @10:10AM (#14130971)
But those advantages don't seem to be of interest to some segment of customers. So, there's clearly some issue with competition.
Re:The Hotel Industry’s Plan to Combat Airbnb by SomeStupidPoint on Monday April 17, 2017 @10:49AM (#14131229)
But some portion of that is the cost of compliance with safety, which AirBNB skips.

There's no reason we shouldn't require things that are effectively hotel rooms to comply with hotel safety regulations.

If AirBNB can only operate by violating the law, why should we support their business model?

Re:The Hotel Industry’s Plan to Combat Airbnb by volkl47 on Monday April 17, 2017 @11:27AM (#14131600)
Actually, there is plenty of reason they shouldn't have to abide by the same regulations.

We have the rules we have for hotels because they're typically large buildings with many rooms (often smaller than even the minimum dwelling size for private apartments) and that density presents significant safety hazards to many people should anything happen, not just you. You being in a 100sf room on the 11th floor makes it very hard to not have you die if there's a fire, especially when there's hundreds of you to evacuate.

There's no reason that someone say...renting out a detached single story house should need anything more than a working smoke/CO detector.

Re:The Hotel Industry’s Plan to Combat Airbnb by exodust on Monday April 17, 2017 @01:42PM (#14132878)
Exactly. The concern about lack of safety is paranoia at best. If the door locks, the smoke alarm is on, and power outlets not hanging from the wall, appliances in working order etc, then there's not much else to worry about.

For my recent Airbnb stay I couldn't fault it. Was more than I expected and great value.

I'm tired of over-priced hotels with boring rooms and mandatory daily room service. I want the option of not having my bed made and towels replaced every day. Stay out of my room until I check out!

Re:The Hotel Industry’s Plan to Combat Airbnb by seangrogg on Monday April 17, 2017 @05:12PM (#14134463)
Most have "Do Not Disturb" / "Do Not Service" signs you can hang from the door to indicate that you're not interested in your room service being performed; often makes housekeeping's life that much easier.
Re:The Hotel Industry’s Plan to Combat Airbnb by ghaff on Monday April 17, 2017 @05:12PM (#14134464)
A number of hotel chains will actually give you points if you decline cleaning these days--which I usually do.

And there are also "serviced apartments" that only clean once a week.

The savings aren't big but I do take advantage of tem.