Re:Why ML/OCaml are good for writing compilers (1998)
by throwaway7645 on Sunday April 16, 2017 @04:35AM
(#14124972)
Thanks, I'll take a look again. He has some sample chapters posted that look really short(3 pages), but I'm guessing that is just a chapter snippet as the book itself is 200 pages?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why ML/OCaml are good for writing compilers (1998)
by haskellandchill on Sunday April 16, 2017 @02:37PM
(#14126840)
The book is short, but there are plenty of exercises and worked solutions in the back. Do the exercises and you will get your money's worth. I suggest buying it with the bundle because More OCaml is good also.