Rails Performance Needs an Overhaul

Re:Rails Performance Needs an Overhaul by jamesbritt on Monday June 07, 2010 @07:40PM (#1412438)

I'm curious if people who say they're using some Java framework for the speed in place of some Ruby framework. which they would prefer for the language, know about JRuby?

And if they do, why not use the Ruby app of choice under JRuby? Pretty much all of the dozen+ Ruby Web frameworks can be bundled up as WAR files and dropped off for Glassfish (or tomcat or whatever) to handle.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Rails Performance Needs an Overhaul by rufugee on Monday June 07, 2010 @09:30PM (#1412704)

If you look at the results in the link I posted, you'll see that Play ends up being 6 times the speed of Rails. I know about JRuby and have used it much, but that sort of speed improvement can't be ignored, especially considering how close Play comes to making Java beautiful...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Rails Performance Needs an Overhaul by jamesbritt on Tuesday June 08, 2010 @12:51PM (#1414486)

Very interesting. Thanks.

Almost missed seeing the Snap and Play stats because the preformatted text was getting formated into a side-scrolling pane.

Not that I want to code in Java, but the speed is impressive.

Still, I have to wonder what the JRuby speed would be for some of the other Ruby frameworks that are faster than Rails, such as Ramaze and Sinatra. (I doubt they would beat those Play numbers, but they would still do better than Rails. A Duby version of Ramaze might rock.)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Rails Performance Needs an Overhaul by abhiyerra on Monday June 07, 2010 @10:29PM (#1412799)

Doing this at current job. Deploying Ruby on Rails as a WAR on Tomcat. I'd argue it's one of the fastest way to deploy especially using Warble. Also the speed is not too shabby either.

[ Parent | on HN ]