News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What made Xerox PARC special? Who else today is like them? by srbl on Friday April 14, 2017 @11:08PM (#14119140)
I work on several DARPA programs and agree with most of this. But some programs are by design far more basic or applied than others. Also worth noting - DARPA generally doesn't pay contractors anything like what the private sector pays employees.

The programs (and their vision, and their success) depend quite a bit on the PM, and on their ideas and engagement. To a lesser extent success depends upon the SETAs as well.

Re:What made Xerox PARC special? Who else today is like them? by munin on Saturday April 15, 2017 @12:19AM (#14119376)
> DARPA generally doesn't pay contractors anything like what the private sector pays employees.

Eh. You can get like a $200/hr rate. If you're a small company with low overhead, you can get paid quite competitively with the private sector in base comp. Difficult to match big G stock grants, though, no one is becoming a millionaire off of this work.

Unless of course what you do on the grant can be turned into a billion dollar company, because (generally) contractors walk away from research programs with liberal rights to the IP they create, with the government retaining some rights to use, but very rarely (IME) retaining direct ownership. Of course, it's probably not that likely that what you do can turn into a billion dollar company but hey, one can dream...

Re:What made Xerox PARC special? Who else today is like them? by omarchowdhury on Saturday April 15, 2017 @01:53AM (#14119598)
Thankfully one doesn't (usually) need to create a billion dollar company to become a millionaire.