News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Princeton’s Ad-Blocker May Put an End to the Ad-Blocking ... by aub3bhat on Friday April 14, 2017 @04:36PM (#14117114)
Or simply a hardened browser DMCA, with signed write-or-execute JS VM that ensures that integrity of the page as rendered cannot be messed with by some pesky extension.
Re:Princeton’s Ad-Blocker May Put an End to the Ad-Blocking ... by pauloday on Friday April 14, 2017 @05:12PM (#14117439)
But then people could just get a list of ad hosts and modify their hosts.txt to redirect those addresses to localhost. I think there's other ways to stop this though. It doesn't seem like a huge stretch for ad providers to give hosts all the stuff to host the ad from their server directly, for example.
Re:Princeton’s Ad-Blocker May Put an End to the Ad-Blocking ... by the8472 on Friday April 14, 2017 @07:42PM (#14118336)
You mean EME? They could basically deliver a single-frame video containing the ads, text and image of the page. With some hitboxes layered over the <video> element so that when the user clicks on something it still is interactive.
Re:Princeton’s Ad-Blocker May Put an End to the Ad-Blocking ... by pjc50 on Friday April 14, 2017 @04:53PM (#14117254)
.. which requires banning all existing browsers, which is something Microsoft, Apple and Google are unlikely to go along with quietly.
Re:Princeton’s Ad-Blocker May Put an End to the Ad-Blocking ... by fkooman on Friday April 14, 2017 @06:02PM (#14117794)
So, next step is DRM for webpages/content in addition to video, either you see all or nothing. The W3C is probably already running with the idea to destroy the "free" web :-)