Low-Level Programming University – A roadmap to becoming a low-level programmer

Re:Low-Level Programming University – A roadmap to becoming ... by CalChris on Thursday April 13, 2017 @04:29PM (#14110662)

An upper limit on the benefits. To me, an upper limit is a negative result. When Leon (in Blade Runner) finds out that he only has 4 years to live (an upper bound) he takes it pretty hard.

Amdahl:

  A fairly obvious conclusion which can be drawn at this
  point is that the effort expended on achieving high
  parallel processing rates is wasted unless it is
  accompanied by achievements in sequential processing
  rates of very nearly the same magnitude.

http://www-inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~n252/paper/Amdahl.pdf

A point made when we read the paper was that Seymour Cray always made sure that his computers were also the fastest scalar computers even though they were sold as vector processors.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Low-Level Programming University – A roadmap to becoming ... by analognoise on Friday April 14, 2017 @01:20PM (#14115687)

Thank you for the excellent explanation; I will consider it more thoroughly.

I think mathematicians consider an upper limit a positive bound - positive, in the sense of being well defined; you're using negative in the other sense? I actually like that quite a bit.

[ Parent | on HN ]