News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Electron is flash for the desktop (2016) by abiox on Tuesday April 11, 2017 @04:57PM (#14092367)
it's been that way since forever. if you're not employing expensive top-ranked brilliant engineers writing aggressively optimized, completely bespoke c applications tuned to every cpu model's feature set and performance characteristics... you just might be externalizing.

insofar as it benefits the budget, you should probably externalize as much as possible. consumers will provide the fitness function through deciding what products they prefer.

Re:Electron is flash for the desktop (2016) by bobwaycott on Tuesday April 11, 2017 @09:47PM (#14094120)
We're not even discussing aggressively optimized C vs web stack. We're talking about a massive segment of today's software developers not even bothering to learn competent C (or Obj-C, Swift, Java, whatever) to build a native application. Hell, it's about the very practice of calling Electron apps native to begin with. The same thing continues to hold across web stack everywhere—reach only for those things that don't require you to learn a new language/paradigm, letting you keep churning out the same thing you build in a browser and call it native for platform X, and let it be on the user to pony up the resources to use it.
Re:Electron is flash for the desktop (2016) by panic on Tuesday April 11, 2017 @05:51PM (#14092831)
consumers will provide the fitness function through deciding what products they prefer.

What about when your users don't have a choice?

Re:Electron is flash for the desktop (2016) by abiox on Tuesday April 11, 2017 @06:33PM (#14093133)
hm... performance metrics, possibly? it may be hard to measure.