Re:AMD Ryzen 5 1600X vs Core i5 Review
by acdha on Tuesday April 11, 2017 @10:35AM
(#14088163)
There's a single benchmark for measuring how long it takes to compile Chrome. That doesn't tell, say, the average IDE user how well it'll handle their interactive experience – it's reasonable to expect that to multithread well – or what the workload the original poster specifically mentioned will be like. Many web developers have e.g databases, redis, CSS/JS compilers, etc. running (directly, in Docker, etc.) in addition to the app, and many of those bottleneck on single-threaded performance, and so it's quite reasonable to ask whether that kind of workload benefits from the extra parallelism which is the main selling point for this processor design.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
It seems to average 10-20 compiles a day... And it's Chromium compilation. That probably averages 1-2.5 hours per compilation. Compiler as a benchmark depends a lot on moving data and jumps from all the parsing, codegen, dataflow analysis, etc.. It's definitely not a floating point heavy benchmark.
Re:AMD Ryzen 5 1600X vs Core i5 Review
by low_battery on Tuesday April 11, 2017 @02:14PM
(#14090847)
Linux kernel compile times:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ryzen-180...