News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AMD Ryzen 5 1600X vs Core i5 Review by mastax on Tuesday April 11, 2017 @10:29AM (#14088097)
There are compilation benchmarks in TFA.

Edit: http://www.anandtech.com/show/11244/the-amd-ryzen-5-1600x-vs...

Re:AMD Ryzen 5 1600X vs Core i5 Review by acdha on Tuesday April 11, 2017 @10:35AM (#14088163)
There's a single benchmark for measuring how long it takes to compile Chrome. That doesn't tell, say, the average IDE user how well it'll handle their interactive experience – it's reasonable to expect that to multithread well – or what the workload the original poster specifically mentioned will be like. Many web developers have e.g databases, redis, CSS/JS compilers, etc. running (directly, in Docker, etc.) in addition to the app, and many of those bottleneck on single-threaded performance, and so it's quite reasonable to ask whether that kind of workload benefits from the extra parallelism which is the main selling point for this processor design.
Re:AMD Ryzen 5 1600X vs Core i5 Review by flamedoge on Tuesday April 11, 2017 @01:16PM (#14090174)
It seems to average 10-20 compiles a day... And it's Chromium compilation. That probably averages 1-2.5 hours per compilation. Compiler as a benchmark depends a lot on moving data and jumps from all the parsing, codegen, dataflow analysis, etc.. It's definitely not a floating point heavy benchmark.
Re:AMD Ryzen 5 1600X vs Core i5 Review by low_battery on Tuesday April 11, 2017 @02:14PM (#14090847)