News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tesla unveils its new ‘sleek and low-profile’ solar panel... by taneq on Tuesday April 11, 2017 @07:15AM (#14086609)
> A more valid wording for this comment would be "I wonder how they altered the design to accommodate for the siphon effect the gap generated," instead of implying they have no idea what they're doing.

If you want a rewording that's closer to my original meaning, it'd be more like "I bet these were made with a cold climate, like that in the northern USA, in mind. They'd lose 10-20% efficiency in summer where I live."

Edit: Although that may not be a terrible thing, if they're overprovisioned compared with the inverter's maximum output so as to keep the inverter at full power for a larger proportion of the time. Depending on climate, you could probably balance out losses due to summer heat with losses due to reduced winter daylight, at least to a degree, giving more reliable year-round power.

Re:Tesla unveils its new ‘sleek and low-profile’ solar panel... by tw04 on Tuesday April 11, 2017 @01:34PM (#14090410)
At the end of the day - does it matter? People expect X output at $X price. If this meets that desire, they're fine. A lot of people would probably be just fine losing some power on hot days to not have something ugly on the roof of their house. For some things aesthetics DO matter - the roof of a house is one of them for most people. Cars tend to be another one as Elon is well aware of.
Re:Tesla unveils its new ‘sleek and low-profile’ solar panel... by astrodust on Tuesday April 11, 2017 @05:15PM (#14092517)
Northern USA. Cold climate. Yeah, like Chicago in July. Super cold.