News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Can Wind Power Revive Jobs in America's Heartland? by toomuchtodo on Sunday April 09, 2017 @10:15PM (#14075534)
Without subsidies, utility solar and wind are already cheaper than coal. Rooftop solar is still behind, will catch up in 24-36 months.

https://cleantechnica.com/2016/12/25/cost-of-solar-power-vs-...

"The first point is the very basic fact that new wind power and/or solar power plants are typically cheaper than new coal, natural gas, or nuclear power plants — even without any governmental support for solar or wind.

Not only are they typically cheaper — they’re much cheaper in many cases.

Yes, these are levelized cost of energy (LCOE) estimates from Lazard based on various assumptions, and they are averages for the US as a whole rather than prices for specific locations within the US, but the lower estimated costs for these renewables are reflected in the real world as well, where solar & wind accounted for 69% of new capacity additions in 2015, 99% of new capacity additions in Q1 2016, a large portion of new capacity additions in Q2 2016, and probably ~⅔ of new capacity additions for 2016 as a whole."

https://www.lazard.com/media/438038/levelized-cost-of-energy... (warning: pdf)

Even with a reduced capacity factor, if you can shift non-essential loads to when renewables are producing (my pool pump needs to run X hours a day, but I'm happy to wait until the cost of power is low to run it), that's essentially "storage" without needing to pay for storage.

There are no comments on this comment yet.