News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:High prevalence of diabetes among people exposed to organ... by Blackthorn on Sunday April 09, 2017 @11:54AM (#14072861)
It's all about luck, you know? They'll all cause some sort of cellular damage. Cancer is when you get super unlucky and it's the right sort of cellular damage that leads to unchecked growth and disables apoptosis.
Re:High prevalence of diabetes among people exposed to organ... by otempomores on Sunday April 09, 2017 @12:02PM (#14072899)
You can load the dice by playing very slowly..eat little..slow metsbolism makes for slow metastasis.
Re:High prevalence of diabetes among people exposed to organ... by pinko on Sunday April 09, 2017 @12:41PM (#14073094)
Can you point to any credible information on this prescription?
Re:High prevalence of diabetes among people exposed to organ... by gukov on Sunday April 09, 2017 @03:19PM (#14073883)
Cancer cells depend almost exclusively on glucose.
Re:High prevalence of diabetes among people exposed to organ... by pm90 on Sunday April 09, 2017 @01:29PM (#14073341)
Seems more like common sense doesn't it? You decrease the chances of consuming random poisons in food by... consuming less food.
Re:High prevalence of diabetes among people exposed to organ... by edejong on Sunday April 09, 2017 @07:25PM (#14074884)
Well, your hypothesis is definitely scientific, since it can be disproven. Couple of counter-hypotheses:

- Consuming less food requires the body to use fat-reserves. Some of these might have been storing heavy metals. With a quick enough change in diet, these might pose a significant risk.

- Consuming less food might alter your gut microbiology. Disheveling this balance might create the risk of infection or even worse.

- Consuming less food (to be precise, less lipids), might alter, or even disable certain parts of the metabolism, often leading to deficiencies in supplies for the immune system, thus making us more vulnerable to 'poisons'.

I don't know which of the above hypotheses are correct, but I am sure they are just as (un)likely as yours is.