News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:OS/2 2.0, Summer ’91 Edition by pjmlp on Sunday April 09, 2017 @11:34AM (#14072758)
No, because System 7, Taligent and Copland were quite different than NeXTSTEP.
Re:OS/2 2.0, Summer ’91 Edition by mtkd on Sunday April 09, 2017 @01:44PM (#14073422)
the siesmic impact of that decision has been kind of lost - iphone etc. all happened because of the moment in time Steve J and others took that decision
Re:OS/2 2.0, Summer ’91 Edition by Razengan on Sunday April 09, 2017 @12:05PM (#14072906)
I mean, what would have prevented NeXTSTEP from being developed at Apple?
Re:OS/2 2.0, Summer ’91 Edition by nickpsecurity on Sunday April 09, 2017 @12:28PM (#14073014)
Backward compatibility or them thinking too alike to have come up with something so different. Plus, they might have bought BeOS. That would've been awesome. We'd have gotten multicore benefits way earlier. Mac OS X server might have also succeeded more given concurrency benefits.
Re:OS/2 2.0, Summer ’91 Edition by pjmlp on Sunday April 09, 2017 @01:21PM (#14073302)
The minds behind NeXT weren't at Apple, Jobs was not alone in this startup.

It was the team work of all these people together that brought NeXTSTEP to life.

You cannot ignore the human aspect of it.

Also Apple never was a UNIX shop, A/UX was just a distraction they never cared much about.