News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: Qt binding for Go with support for all major ope... by rsynnott on Saturday April 08, 2017 @04:57PM (#14068999)
Here's an old example of how it can (apparently; presumably according to Google's lawyers) be done for iOS: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4302517

Google has now killed off Sparrow entirely, but they used to make it available for download so that an end-user could in principle re-link it, to comply with the LGPL.

Re:Show HN: Qt binding for Go with support for all major ope... by ChajusSaib on Saturday April 08, 2017 @06:50PM (#14069493)
So if I were to statically link my application but release the object files and let user's re-compile it with another version of the library then that would satisfy the LGPL license? If so I think I might be headed back to Qt.
Re:Show HN: Qt binding for Go with support for all major ope... by paxcoder on Saturday April 08, 2017 @07:27PM (#14069637)
Seems so: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#LGPLStaticVsDynami...

It would appear that once again the FUD is unjustified, and in reality GNU/SFLC licenses well made

Re:Show HN: Qt binding for Go with support for all major ope... by chrisseaton on Saturday April 08, 2017 @07:05PM (#14069555)
Or just dynamically link.
Re:Show HN: Qt binding for Go with support for all major ope... by ChajusSaib on Saturday April 08, 2017 @07:23PM (#14069618)
I'm asking for iOS which won't allow it.