News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:In Event of Moon Disaster (1969) by candiodari on Friday April 07, 2017 @11:18PM (#14065105)
I wonder, when it says "at the point when NASA ends communication with the men", why did it say that ? Wouldn't it be possible to maintain communication until long after they would have died ? Would they cut it off beforehand ? Was there something like a movie to alleviate the boredom while the oxygen ran out ? Which one ?

Additionally isn't there more analysis ? What are some scenarios ? I mean crashing after a failed launch attempt on the moon would perhaps be less disastrous than on earth, but can you realistically hope to survive a fall of several kilometers ?

Re:In Event of Moon Disaster (1969) by rspeer on Friday April 07, 2017 @11:40PM (#14065171)
From what I've heard, they would plan to deliberately cut off communication, so that the entire world would not listen to two men slowly dying.
Re:In Event of Moon Disaster (1969) by rocky1138 on Saturday April 08, 2017 @09:18AM (#14066756)
I had always assumed they brought cyanide pills with them just in case of disaster. I know that if I was stranded on the moon with no hope of escape, I wouldn't want to sit there for 2 or 3 days until dying of starvation. I'd rather just eat a pill and be done with it.
Re:In Event of Moon Disaster (1969) by bonzini on Saturday April 08, 2017 @09:54AM (#14066903)
They probably would have died of CO2 poisoning, since the air filters were only available in limited quantity.
Re:In Event of Moon Disaster (1969) by thearn4 on Saturday April 08, 2017 @11:25AM (#14067354)
they could probably have just depressurized their suits and would have lost consciousness extremely quickly.
Re:In Event of Moon Disaster (1969) by wdr1 on Sunday April 09, 2017 @02:07AM (#14070748)
This.

Whenever asked about cyanide, the astronauts always laughed, because if they wanted to kill themselves, there were about a million ways to do so. They didn't need cyanide.

Re:In Event of Moon Disaster (1969) by leoc on Saturday April 08, 2017 @02:29AM (#14065634)
> Additionally isn't there more analysis ? What are some scenarios ? I mean crashing after a failed launch attempt on the moon would perhaps be less disastrous than on earth, but can you realistically hope to survive a fall of several kilometers ?

I am not an expert, but I guess that the letter was mostly intened to cover cases where the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ascent_Propulsion_System failed to ignite at all, or perhaps sputtered early enough that the astronauts had a relatively soft landing after failing to make orbit.

Re:In Event of Moon Disaster (1969) by robryk on Saturday April 08, 2017 @04:14AM (#14065919)
Agree about the case when APS fails to operate. There were emergency procedures that involved disassembling some part of it and directly wiring a power connection to the oxidizer and propellant valves. See the end of https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/LM11HandbookVol2.pdf

I think the latter scenario is virtually impossible: the ascent stage didn't have any landing gear and the engine wasn't throttlable, so even a relatively soft landing with fully operational APS would be impossible.

Re:In Event of Moon Disaster (1969) by masor on Friday April 07, 2017 @11:35PM (#14065149)
I think that's just a euphemism for when NASA is no longer able to communicate with the men, which is also a euphemism...