PySolFC – A collection of Solitaire games for Python

Re:PySolFC – A collection of Solitaire games for Python by xapata on Friday April 07, 2017 @11:37AM (#14060566)

I've been using 3.6 for some personal work and man are f-strings and ordered dicts wonderful. I don't want to go back.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:PySolFC – A collection of Solitaire games for Python by renesd on Friday April 07, 2017 @12:15PM (#14060933)

1_000_000 times this.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:PySolFC – A collection of Solitaire games for Python by TylerE on Friday April 07, 2017 @12:43PM (#14061256)

OrderedDict is just a stdlib import away in Py2.7.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:PySolFC – A collection of Solitaire games for Python by xapata on Friday April 07, 2017 @01:39PM (#14061789)

Yeah, but... those are ugly. ``m = {}`` is beautiful.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:PySolFC – A collection of Solitaire games for Python by Macha on Friday April 07, 2017 @01:45PM (#14061849)

dict == OrderedDict is a cpython implementation detail. Not doing the import is just leaving a footgun for yourself if you ever decide to try PyPy or VOC or similar.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:PySolFC – A collection of Solitaire games for Python by rspeer on Friday April 07, 2017 @02:50PM (#14062460)

I don't think it's much of a footgun, and I don't think it's limited to CPython.

In Python 3.6, kwargs are ordered. In all versions of Python, kwargs are a dict. Therefore, in any implementation of Python 3.6, dicts are ordered.

The dev team has stopped short of promising that dicts are ordered, but I can't see how one would realistically be harmed by assuming it to be true.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:PySolFC – A collection of Solitaire games for Python by xapata on Friday April 07, 2017 @03:15PM (#14062692)

The 3.6 CPython dict item storage algorithm was implemented in PyPy first.

[ Parent | on HN ]