U.S. FCC chairman plans fast-track repeal of net neutrality: sources

Re:U.S. FCC chairman plans fast-track repeal of net neutrali... by seanp2k2 on Friday April 07, 2017 @01:28AM (#14057366)

It's also amazing how little it costs to buy them. It's on the order of a hundred thousand dollars. Check out campaign contributions and you'll see. It needs to be at least 10-100x more expensive to really make a difference. It'd be hilarious / depressing is politicians started colluding to squeeze companies for orders of magnitude more in bribes (sorry, "campaign contributions").

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:U.S. FCC chairman plans fast-track repeal of net neutrali... by kablaa on Friday April 07, 2017 @01:32AM (#14057383)

I wonder if it would be possible to make some kind of "internet superpack". Like a collection of registered voters who would crowdfund more money than they are getting.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:U.S. FCC chairman plans fast-track repeal of net neutrali... by bluejekyll on Friday April 07, 2017 @01:58AM (#14057463)

Isn't that effectively what the EFF is?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:U.S. FCC chairman plans fast-track repeal of net neutrali... by aanm1988 on Friday April 07, 2017 @03:36AM (#14057848)

Wasn't tehre an article recently about how SV (and coastal companies in general) have pretty much screwed themselves when it comes to this stuff?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:U.S. FCC chairman plans fast-track repeal of net neutrali... by lostlogin on Friday April 07, 2017 @06:22AM (#14058564)

As a total outsider - it's amazing that a place as huge as the US has a two-party system. splitting everything into one camp or the other makes for groupings that don't always work.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:U.S. FCC chairman plans fast-track repeal of net neutrali... by alistairSH on Friday April 07, 2017 @02:53PM (#14062487)

A two-party system is the expected result of plurality rule (which the US uses almost exclusively for national elections).[1]

1- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duverger%27s_law

[ Parent | on HN ]