Re:Phil Schiller, Craig Federighi and John Ternus on the Sta...
by fjarlq on Friday April 07, 2017 @01:46AM
(#14057432)
Ah, yeah, good question: why does Apple need to be the one to produce Mac Pro? I could only speculate. Wouldn't it cut significantly into their iMac and MacBook sales if they opened things up like that?
Re:Phil Schiller, Craig Federighi and John Ternus on the Sta...
by timc3 on Friday April 07, 2017 @02:29AM
(#14057590)
Typically it introduces a support and development burden, product fragmentation and a weaker brand. They tried it before (I had one of the Mac clones, it was just ok).
It would eat into their sales but the other side effects are worse, and they would have to look into creating a channel for being able to make money from MacOS.
There is a reason for a number of these boutique Windows workstation manufacturers as there value add is to provide a supported product out of known good tested configurations, because for someone that just wants a machine that works it’s still some effort and Microsoft still gets money for the Windows license.
Re:Phil Schiller, Craig Federighi and John Ternus on the Sta...
by tjriley82 on Friday April 07, 2017 @02:34AM
(#14057613)
Yes, it would. Apple experiemented with this in the mid 90s: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macintosh_clone it didn't really work out.
There are plenty of fantastic motherboards, GPUs, power supplies and quiet and good looking cases to choose from, I only need a guarantee of future OSX support.