Re:Twitter refuses US order to disclose owner of anti-Trump ...
by rfrank on Thursday April 06, 2017 @09:00PM
(#14056170)
It's just amusing to me how only one of those bad things seems to be "terrifying" or "disturbing". Which is worse, unmasking the twitter account owner, or Susan Rice's unmasking of intel reports on Trump's campaign staff?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Twitter refuses US order to disclose owner of anti-Trump ...
by Dylan16807 on Friday April 07, 2017 @02:32AM
(#14057605)
The equivalent to "unmasking" would be someone inside twitter knowing the name. Totally incomparable to mandated disclosure.
Re:Twitter refuses US order to disclose owner of anti-Trump ...
by memmcgee on Thursday April 06, 2017 @10:53PM
(#14056708)
Doesn't it bother you that these names showed up in intelligence reports on Russia?
Re:Twitter refuses US order to disclose owner of anti-Trump ...
by alphapapa on Friday April 07, 2017 @07:00AM
(#14058703)
Would it bother you if Nancy Pelosi's name did? After all, she's had meetings with the Russian prime minister, ambassador, etc. Photographic proof on Twitter.
Re:Twitter refuses US order to disclose owner of anti-Trump ...
by memmcgee on Monday April 17, 2017 @01:51AM
(#14129420)
Nancy Pelosi is also House minority leader who would have official business with the Ambassador. Pelosi's meetings were also not in secret.
Re:Twitter refuses US order to disclose owner of anti-Trump ...
by shitgoose on Friday April 07, 2017 @12:40AM
(#14057174)
"intelligence reports on Russia" = had a phone conversation with Russian ambassador. in soviet union one could easily get a prison sentence for talking to US ambassador. it is fascinating to watch the transformation of US into USSR.
Re:Twitter refuses US order to disclose owner of anti-Trump ...
by biaachmonkie on Thursday April 06, 2017 @09:55PM
(#14056447)
Why do you want to ignore and sweep away the investigations into the possible misdeeds of Trump and his associates? Are you a paid Russian troll?