News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nuclear plant shutdowns tied to coal pollution, decreased... by mpweiher on Wednesday April 05, 2017 @04:28AM (#14040608)
> We still don't know how to handle spent fuel.

Actually we do, technically, and the amount is trivial (and can be reused, though that isn't currently being done). Spent fuel is a political problem. In fact, last time I checked even just the radiation from coal power plants is greater than from nuclear plants.

> The exact same line was fed to us when Chernobyl was state of the art

Chernobyl was never state of the art and western reactors, which are much safer, are also of a design derived from military designs, not optimized for safety. Also, the negative health effects of coal and other energy sources are so much worse than even Chernobyl that it isn't funny.

Re:Nuclear plant shutdowns tied to coal pollution, decreased... by Turing_Machine on Wednesday April 05, 2017 @09:35AM (#14041955)
"Chernobyl was never state of the art"

Right. Chernobyl-style designs were rejected at a very early stage in the West.

Re:Nuclear plant shutdowns tied to coal pollution, decreased... by opo on Wednesday April 05, 2017 @02:19PM (#14044291)
>Chernobyl was never state of the art...

That is being pretty charitable. A plant like Chernobyl would have been illegal to build in any other country.

Re:Nuclear plant shutdowns tied to coal pollution, decreased... by redwood on Wednesday April 05, 2017 @07:44PM (#14046720)
Political problem? Yes. How much will the problem cost to fix? Uncertainty has a cost.