News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google claims Levandowski launched competing projects lon... by EGreg on Monday April 03, 2017 @09:16PM (#14028759)
Please see https://qbix.com/blog

Why doesn't Google do this?

Re:Google claims Levandowski launched competing projects lon... by cowsandmilk on Monday April 03, 2017 @10:03PM (#14028964)
That relies on having a product that is already generating revenue, how do you apply that to R&D like autonomous cars where that revenue isn't currently present?
Re:Google claims Levandowski launched competing projects lon... by EGreg on Tuesday April 04, 2017 @07:50AM (#14031554)
Ok but you mentioned someone making a 1% improvement in existing revenue. For THAT.
Re:Google claims Levandowski launched competing projects lon... by tehlike on Tuesday April 04, 2017 @10:46AM (#14033154)
also on a second thought, once things become incremental, chances of someone doing the same increment as another one (who generates that 100M) is high, hence the lower pay.
Re:Google claims Levandowski launched competing projects lon... by tehlike on Tuesday April 04, 2017 @10:12AM (#14032754)
that could create imbalance - everyone moving into ads.
Re:Google claims Levandowski launched competing projects lon... by EGreg on Tuesday April 04, 2017 @01:05PM (#14034922)
So why not do this for all projects that need it?