Re:Companies start implanting microchips into workers' bodies
by forthwoart on Monday April 03, 2017 @06:47PM
(#14027946)
Because it's too inconvenient to carry a badge? Or make the badge smaller/nfc-tag-like?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Companies start implanting microchips into workers' bodies
by dv_dt on Monday April 03, 2017 @06:59PM
(#14028042)
That was my first thought, if you want smaller than a badge, then maybe a ring or bracelet should be tried before an implanted device!
Re:Companies start implanting microchips into workers' bodies
by markestefanos on Monday April 03, 2017 @07:14PM
(#14028127)
I can't think of any benefits here that a ring/bracelet wouldn't provide, plus the added benefit of removability without surgery.
Re:Companies start implanting microchips into workers' bodies
by eternalban on Monday April 03, 2017 @08:17PM
(#14028457)
Conditioning.
[& p.s. since HN doesn't like single word replies]
They are normalizing mechanisms of maximal control. Just like the perp walk of innocents in airports. Chipping is what we do to cattle. And of course, a simple hospital style bracelet would afford a substantially larger surface area for embedding of technology.
Re:Companies start implanting microchips into workers' bodies
by s73ver on Monday April 03, 2017 @08:13PM
(#14028422)
Getting all kinds of press in the tech world.
Re:Companies start implanting microchips into workers' bodies
by gozur88 on Monday April 03, 2017 @07:46PM
(#14028310)
I doubt the companies care that much about convenience. What they're probably thinking is "oh, it's like a badge nobody can steal!" Which is wrong. The stealing is just a lot more painful.