Re:Tesla Passes Ford by Market Value
by Judgmentality on Monday April 03, 2017 @05:18PM
(#14027226)
Do you have any evidence that either of those will make money? I have evidence that pet friendly cars lose money - Uber used to have a program that catered towards dogs and they cancelled it because it lost money.
You haven't solved anything until you've demonstrated a working solution. If it were so easy to fix problems in the real world, politicians would have our economy constantly booming, there would be more jobs than people, and the Middle East would be the most peaceful place on Earth.
Anyway, I don't think we're going to agree on anything. I'm exiting this thread.
> Uber used to have a program that catered towards dogs and they cancelled it because it lost money.
By the same standard uber as a whole is not a working solution.
Re:Tesla Passes Ford by Market Value
by emodendroket on Monday April 03, 2017 @11:34PM
(#14029284)
In fact it may not be.
Re:Tesla Passes Ford by Market Value
by vectorjohn on Monday April 03, 2017 @11:19PM
(#14029236)
Give it a rest. There is no possible way he can solve it right now, we don't have self driving cars yet.
Re:Tesla Passes Ford by Market Value
by emodendroket on Monday April 03, 2017 @06:24PM
(#14027786)
I thought I was here to discuss programming and related news rather than engaging in mindless boosterism.
I literally did share a solution in this post, and the one before.
- Commoditize storage and transport it to you on demand
- Offer pet friendly cars
Boom. Solved.
As I also wrote: "I'm sure you could come up with a better solution if you tried."
Is this hackernews, where builders come to talk about exciting ways they're solving tomorrow's problems?
Am I on the wrong site?