News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by faitswulff on Sunday April 02, 2017 @10:14PM (#14020184)
This makes me think that drivers aren't the only ones whose mental circuitry Uber is trying to master. "Well well well, looks like users don't notice if our ETA is off by 10 minutes as long as we show them an interactive map..."
Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by macNchz on Sunday April 02, 2017 @11:26PM (#14020414)
This smells like the prototypical A/B-tested product 'optimization' that has become widespread these days. Sure the data probably makes it look like an unequivocal win in the short term, but it compounds ill will towards the platform every time someone goes downstairs to meet their car 10 minutes too early in a downpour.
Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by heymijo on Monday April 03, 2017 @10:12AM (#14022859)
This reminds me of Schlitz beer and its downfall [0]. Schlitz went from battling Budweiser for domestic supremacy to a case study in how to ruin your brand by repeatedly cheapening your product coupled with a belief that your customers are stupid.

Uber has been like Teflon so far, and Lyft is no Budweiser, but do I wonder if there's a tipping point.

[0] http://www.philcooke.com/the-schlitz-mistake-and-what-beer-c...

Re:Uber's experiment in behavioral science to subtly entice ... by vosper on Monday April 03, 2017 @04:13AM (#14021287)
I think it's the exact opposite of "users don't notice". I think it's more that people are annoyed but Uber can't measure that easily, so they don't realize. Anecdote: my friends and I have frequently experienced this recently and the result has just been frustration - "it said 3 minutes and now it says 10 minutes" or "why's he driving over there?!". I hang on for the Uber, but if there was a taxi driving by I probably would have hailed it.