Re:Iosevka – A Typeface for Code, from Code
by riquito on Saturday April 01, 2017 @01:52AM
(#14010709)
I like the use of ligatures to write <= as ≤
I disagree; if you want ≤, use ≤.
Oddly, Iosveka currently doesn't provide (for instance) ⇒ or ⟹, according to the specimen sheet, even though it contains ligature-derived glyphs that look just like ⇒ and ⟹.
Re:Iosevka – A Typeface for Code, from Code
by riquito on Saturday April 01, 2017 @09:39PM
(#14015261)
I want ≤ but I don't want syntax errors in my code.
Well, yes. For some languages we'll need to wait for standards committees, but there are a number of popular single-implementation languages that really have no excuse.
Re:Iosevka – A Typeface for Code, from Code
by haldean on Saturday April 01, 2017 @09:48AM
(#14012092)
How do you get the ligatures to work with vim? I've been trying to wrangle PragmataPro and gvim for a while but haven't managed yet.
Re:Iosevka – A Typeface for Code, from Code
by photon-torpedo on Saturday April 01, 2017 @10:09AM
(#14012178)
If you use vim in the terminal, ligature support just depends on the terminal emulator. In Linux, qterminal and konsole work.
Re:Iosevka – A Typeface for Code, from Code
by indemnity on Saturday April 01, 2017 @12:38AM
(#14010458)
Which color scheme is that, if you don't mind? I always keep an eye open for pleasing colors :)
Of course not!
The color scheme [0] is my fork of tango-plus [1] with a few small changes.
Here's some Dafny code for your viewing pleasure: https://i.imgur.com/clxUR1y.png