News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:E.P.A. Chief, Rejecting Agency’s Science, Chooses Not to ... by drallison on Thursday March 30, 2017 @12:04PM (#13996563)
I find it curious that the moderators grayed out the references provided in comments by "randomgthoughts". I would be curious to know the rationale. It seems to me that citations into the literature are a plus and not a minus.

The elided references are:

https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0653-....

"D. Drew et al., Chlorpyrifos: Revised Human Health Risk Assessment for Registration Review, December 29, 2014, D424485; 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Literature Review on Neurodevelopment Effects & FQPA Safety Factor Determination for the Organophosphate Pesticides, September 15, 2015, D331251; 

R. Bohaty and J. Hetrick. Chlorpyrifos Registration Review Drinking Water Assessment, April 14, 2016, D432921 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chlorpyrifos Issue Paper: Evaluation of Biomonitoring Data from Epidemiology Studies, March 11, 2016 and supporting analyses presented to the FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel’s (SAP) meeting on April 1921, 2016, (EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0062). "

https://www.epa.gov/ingredients-used-pesticide- products/revised-human-health-risk-assessment-chlorpyrifos

Re:E.P.A. Chief, Rejecting Agency’s Science, Chooses Not to ... by tptacek on Thursday March 30, 2017 @12:38PM (#13996862)
The moderators almost certainly didn't do anything. If you have a question about something that happened with moderation, mail it to [email protected].
Re:E.P.A. Chief, Rejecting Agency’s Science, Chooses Not to ... by randomthoughtss on Thursday March 30, 2017 @12:45PM (#13996932)
I deleted them from one of my replies and moved them to a different reply.