News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Voice Calls: Secure, Crystal-Clear, AI-Powered by dgellow on Thursday March 30, 2017 @08:19AM (#13994710)
The lack of sync is a feature. That's what you get when you have a secure system.
Re:Voice Calls: Secure, Crystal-Clear, AI-Powered by unicornporn on Thursday March 30, 2017 @08:31AM (#13994771)
How come https://riot.im (Matrix) manages to sync between devices AND have E2E, while also being federated?

That's not what you get when you have a secure system, that's what you get when you design a system that can collect (and possibly monetize) the data of millions of users.

Re:Voice Calls: Secure, Crystal-Clear, AI-Powered by kiriakasis on Thursday March 30, 2017 @08:48AM (#13994860)
I believe that making sync work with E2E bring either security issues or more burden on the user; I would like them in telegram, but I also like the "if you send this message you exactly the device it go to, not an old laptop i forgot in the office, just my phone". it is meant to be secure on a device level.
Re:Voice Calls: Secure, Crystal-Clear, AI-Powered by jyrkesh on Thursday March 30, 2017 @04:33PM (#13998627)
Yeah, you'd have to manually put your private keys onto your computer from your phone.
Re:Voice Calls: Secure, Crystal-Clear, AI-Powered by Arathorn on Friday March 31, 2017 @02:46AM (#14001661)
Or you do what Matrix does, and given every device its own keypair, and let users track whether they are talking to a trusted decice or not.
Re:Voice Calls: Secure, Crystal-Clear, AI-Powered by dgellow on Thursday March 30, 2017 @08:51AM (#13994888)
That's not what I meant. Yes you can have sync and E2E. With different trade-offs.

Telegram is secure from device to device, not from account to account. If I send you a secure message from my iPad I don't have to worry about the web session I opened a week ago on someone else laptop.

Re:Voice Calls: Secure, Crystal-Clear, AI-Powered by dgellow on Thursday March 30, 2017 @03:34PM (#13998241)
People down voting this comment, care to explain what's wrong with it?
Re:Voice Calls: Secure, Crystal-Clear, AI-Powered by Canada on Thursday March 30, 2017 @10:02AM (#13995400)
Signal and WhatsApp both support multi-device encrypted chats. Signal is better than WhatsApp in this respect as your primary device doesn't need to be online for it to work.
Re:Voice Calls: Secure, Crystal-Clear, AI-Powered by NoGravitas on Thursday March 30, 2017 @10:40AM (#13995723)
Signal multi-device support is very limited. Doesn't support multiple mobile devices. Primary device must be a phone, all others must be desktop computers with Chrome.
Re:Voice Calls: Secure, Crystal-Clear, AI-Powered by newman314 on Thursday March 30, 2017 @12:00PM (#13996531)
This. I would love for Signal to have multiple mobile device support.
Re:Voice Calls: Secure, Crystal-Clear, AI-Powered by Canada on Thursday March 30, 2017 @11:45AM (#13996362)
True, though that's a gap in UI rather than a constraint of the protocol.
Re:Voice Calls: Secure, Crystal-Clear, AI-Powered by tgragnato on Thursday March 30, 2017 @11:57AM (#13996500)
If you want to use a standalone app then you can achieve it using NW.js

https://timtaubert.de/blog/2016/01/build-your-own-signal-des...

Re:Voice Calls: Secure, Crystal-Clear, AI-Powered by lucb1e on Thursday March 30, 2017 @09:42AM (#13995228)
Huh? How is exchanging encryption keys between your devices and syncing history insecure? Because that's how Wire solves it.
Re:Voice Calls: Secure, Crystal-Clear, AI-Powered by goda90 on Thursday March 30, 2017 @10:44AM (#13995777)
My guess would be concerns about spreading around the keys being too easy, so you might end up with a compromised end point.