Re:Stanford Professor Loses Political Battle To Simplify Tax...
by quadrangle on Wednesday March 29, 2017 @11:09PM
(#13992561)
The goal of those types of politicians isn't to make the government less awful. Their goal is to make "the government" out to be the enemy so that the citizens don't start thinking that they can use government to actually offset the power that corporations have (through plain capital and through regulatory capture).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Stanford Professor Loses Political Battle To Simplify Tax...
by kakapupu on Thursday March 30, 2017 @01:59AM
(#13993264)
> they can use government to actually offset the power that corporations have (through plain capital and through regulatory capture)
You're saying people can "use" the government to compensate for the government itself preventing competition with their cronies.
Isn't that a bit of a fool's errand, even disregarding the fact that in reality we don't use the government - the government very much uses us.
Re:Stanford Professor Loses Political Battle To Simplify Tax...
by lagadu on Thursday March 30, 2017 @08:34AM
(#13994792)
>the government very much uses us.
No, we put the government and the rules it has to follow in place to ensure that it has our best interests and nothing else in mind. They are a tool we use to make sure the state is run the way we want it to be.
Re:Stanford Professor Loses Political Battle To Simplify Tax...
by quadrangle on Thursday March 30, 2017 @11:53AM
(#13996440)
Oh come on, I'm the one defending the idea that government can be positive and serve the people. But we can't honestly suggest that this is what it IS already like it's the plain truth. It's just something it sometimes sorta is (lots of examples that live up to the ideal, lots that don't). It's a premise that is possible. Governments always have been historically run by powerful interests and not actually lived up to democratic ideals.