There are just as many angled stories in the mainstream media and they are actually worse because they claim to be objective.
Trump, unprompted: I like to grab women by the pussy!
Women: So yeah, Trump grabbed me by the pussy.
Trump & conservatives: Bitches be lyin'
Trump: Yeah, that’s her. With the gold. I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.
Bush: Whatever you want.
Trump: Grab ’em by the pussy. You can do anything.
Furthermore if you are going to call what he describes sexual assault then all men who lean in on a women and start kissing them are committing sexual assault. Any guy who tries to get his hand up under a womans shirt is committing sexual assault.
You forgot the part of "they let you do it". Thats not sexual assault.
If I sucker punch you does it mean you let me do it?
The logic you seem to have bought into is completely out of bounds with reality. These things happens everyday and aren't sexual assault, but because Trump does it suddenly it is. What an amazing logic.
I would love to see you prosecute someone for saying those things with nothing more than that tape recording.
And keep your ad hominem to reddit. This is not a discussion about me but about something he said or whether it constitutes sexual assault which it obviously do not.
And again if the women don't mind they don't mind, just like some of them don't mind other rich men grabbing them as long as they can get to live the lifestyle.
The only one with a history of this as far as I can see was Clinton who pushed a cigar up an interns vagina.
In your "logical" universe this was assault too and today you could probably get away with adding white male privilege.
So either show some proof of him being a sexual assaulter or there is nothing not even theoretically that makes that assault.
Add in against their will and all that changes but thats not what you have.
There are no such studies for the NYT, editorial page bias notwithstanding.