Re:The TSA's Selective Laptop Ban
by logicallee on Monday March 27, 2017 @10:25AM
(#13967945)
The part that you say "nobody says" is what I took the GP to be saying, roughly... Obviously we can expand your "an attack that is known" to preventing other kinds of attack - for example if a $50 device beeps whenever there's an explosive (it sniffs the air as passengers walk past it) then it can prevent unknown attacks and I'm sure you would agree that it should be installed rather than "accept" that passengers will always bring explosives on planes. That's all I mean -- other arguments are fine, just not the argument from helplessness. It's a weak argument and won't convince anybody.
> for example if a $50 device beeps whenever there's an explosive (it sniffs the air as passengers walk past it) then it can prevent unknown attacks and I'm sure you would agree that it should be installed rather than "accept" that passengers will always bring explosives on planes.
Of course. Passive detection of illegal substances is fine by me. But making me partially disrobe, manual searches of by bags, and prevention from travel if I do not submit to the coercion is wrong and a violation of everyone's rights. A "bomb" detector is no different from a smoke detector. It's not a search (as long as it isn't also used to identify people by smell and track their movements).
Re:The TSA's Selective Laptop Ban
by paulajohnson on Monday March 27, 2017 @11:02AM
(#13968260)
> The more we realize we are responsible for our own well being, take responsibility [...]
How, exactly, am I supposed to "take responsibility" for spotting someone with a hidden bomb when I get on an airplane?
You can always not fly! Seems silly to be so scared.
Re:The TSA's Selective Laptop Ban
by AstralStorm on Monday March 27, 2017 @11:53AM
(#13968736)
Report credibly to the stewards.
Also say why you think it is a bomb. Provide credentials.
No one is saying we shouldn't attempt to stop an attack that is known, or that we shouldn't investigate who carried out and authorized an attack and seek justice. The primary role that government serves to the people with respect to crime is the serving of justice. Protection from all things harmful and crime prevention are not guaranteed. Anyone trying to sell you such guarantee is either lying or delusional.
The more we realize we are responsible for our own well being, take responsibility, and keep a watchful eye, the safer and better off everyone will be. When it's finally understood that people will protect themselves and deny a terrorists ability to carry out a plot, the less of these monsters we'll have to deal with.