News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber takes its self-driving cars off the road after one f... by nostromo95 on Sunday March 26, 2017 @02:36PM (#13962299)
I mean there's a rational financial reason why someone optimistic about self-driving cars would be hesitant to take your bet -- they're magnifying their risk wrt self-driving cars, so if the technology doesn't come to fruition they're doubly screwed. If anything they'd rather take the opposite side of the bet so they can hedge.
Re:Uber takes its self-driving cars off the road after one f... by seibelj on Sunday March 26, 2017 @02:38PM (#13962314)
It's more about people publicly putting their name against me, which I would post on my website, saying to the world that they actually think self driving cars are going to happen. I would like people actually in the tech industry to bet against me, not people looking to make money. It's more a reality check about who is willing to put their money where their mouth is, because I think there are few.

I think a fair wager would be, "On March 26th 2022 at 2am, 830am, 5pm, and 11pm, a self driving call will legally take seibelj from [his address] in Boston to [address] in Cambridge. The car will require no human intervention and it will arrive at the destination regardless of time, weather, traffic, and construction."

Re:Uber takes its self-driving cars off the road after one f... by nostromo95 on Sunday March 26, 2017 @02:50PM (#13962382)
Ha, I'd still say it's possible for people to believe (say, >75% probability) that self-driving cars will come in the next five years AND have a good reason not to take you up on the bet. Namely, in the event they lose the bet they NOT ONLY (a) don't get to enjoy self-driving cars, (b) don't see a return on whatever time/financial investment they made into the technology and (c) lose $1000 to you, but they also (d) are publicly embarrassed on your website.