News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Scientists sent a rocket to Mars for less than it cost to... by BeetleB on Friday March 17, 2017 @03:49PM (#13897358)
>There were a couple of studies that showed that in developing countries where social support structures aren't strong you generally see a lot more women go into the less gender traditional fields such as engineering. See Eastern Europe, China, India etc.

I had to read that twice to follow you.

Be careful with your wording. What you meant was government funded social structures, as opposed to actual social structures (family structure, etc). Most Indians who move to the US will be quick to tell you how much worse the social support structures are in the US. In India, there is usually little need for daycare (relatives almost always look after the kids). Same goes for taking care of the chronically unhealthy people, etc.

Re:Scientists sent a rocket to Mars for less than it cost to... by mariodiana on Saturday March 18, 2017 @11:17AM (#13901610)
My guess is that the fundamental driving force is this. There are great masses of people in a country like India living in abject poverty. If you're smart and lucky enough to have opportunity, what you have in India, that you don't have in a country like the United States, is day-to-day contact with the wretchedly poor. This staring you in the face puts your choices into stark relief.

In the U.S., for example, a bright young lady with opportunities can rest assured that, no matter what she chooses to study, life has a good chance of turning out alright for her. Her family, friends, teachers, and so forth generally agree. However in India, for example, it's far more likely that a bright young lady with opportunities will be thoroughly encouraged -- some might even say pushed -- to pursue only the most remunerative and prestigious occupations. In plain language: "Do you want to end up in the gutter?"

I wonder if these are the social structures that make the most difference.

Re:Scientists sent a rocket to Mars for less than it cost to... by gnufied on Saturday March 18, 2017 @11:55AM (#13901819)
This strikes too close to home. Growing up in India - one of my uncles drove Autorickshaw's for living - each time he came to our home and saw me not studying, his response was pretty much - "what the heck are you doing? Do you want to drive autorickshaw's for living?"

I had no response to that.

Also - a lot of women in their 30s/20s now have seen - what it means to be a homemaker in India. I think neither their mothers and nor themselves want a life like that.

Re:Scientists sent a rocket to Mars for less than it cost to... by joericky233223 on Sunday March 19, 2017 @01:29AM (#13905415)
The mentality was if you are not required to do the physical work then why are you not studying which will free from the physical work forever and you do not have to live a life like the adult uncles who had no choice but to do the physical work to survive . As a school going kids this attitude cause much frustration and depression because they are not permitted to play. But I am happy now that this hard love from my uneducated but well wishing uncles and other souls had made me capable of using internet for other than social media.
Re:Scientists sent a rocket to Mars for less than it cost to... by joericky233223 on Sunday March 19, 2017 @01:13AM (#13905345)
If you are not born in India and have guessed this just by studying about India from books and media then you are an excellent guesser.
Re:Scientists sent a rocket to Mars for less than it cost to... by BadassFractal on Friday March 17, 2017 @04:45PM (#13897838)
That's fair, cheers.
Re:Scientists sent a rocket to Mars for less than it cost to... by zdkl on Saturday March 18, 2017 @05:08AM (#13900527)
Does anyone have a link to these studies?
Re:Scientists sent a rocket to Mars for less than it cost to... by joericky233223 on Sunday March 19, 2017 @01:31AM (#13905426)
That's the point. The author merely guessed it from the data of other studies which is impressive and totally correct