Re:In Manufacturing and Retail, Robot Labor is Cheaper Than ...
by Quarrelsome on Friday March 17, 2017 @05:02AM
(#13892549)
the sad truth is that slave labour needs no startup cost beyond a fist.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:In Manufacturing and Retail, Robot Labor is Cheaper Than ...
by kevinr on Friday March 17, 2017 @05:18AM
(#13892614)
Fists ain't cheap.
Slaves are capital, and, like all capital, acquiring and maintaining them has nonzero cost.
In the antebellum American South, some tasks like ditch-digging were sufficiently hazardous that a plantation owner would rather not risk their investment in their slaves, and so would hire Irish ditch-diggers by the day, as the plantation owner would be out less money if they died while digging the ditch.
Re:In Manufacturing and Retail, Robot Labor is Cheaper Than ...
by richthegeek on Friday March 17, 2017 @06:58AM
(#13892999)
Somewhat off topic, but I can't figure out how ditch-digging would be particularly hazardous? The only danger I can think of would be a wall collapsing, but that could surely be avoided..
Re:In Manufacturing and Retail, Robot Labor is Cheaper Than ...
by JetSpiegel on Friday March 17, 2017 @07:50AM
(#13893232)
I'm assuming heat related conditions.