News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Police ask for whole city's Google searches, and a judge ... by IanCal on Thursday March 16, 2017 @02:44PM (#13887767)
I'm not sure I understand your changes. We're talking about searching for a relatively unknown person, so I'd assume we're talking about a rare search term. This is not like asking for who searched about "wire fraud".

> >from a particular designer store should be "from a specific location of a particular global discount store"

Sure, fair enough, my point was simply that it was a rare thing and pretty identifiable.

> (images, once acquired, last forever; there's nothing saying the image was acquired in the time window of the subpoena)

I'm sorry, I don't understand this sentence.

There are no comments on this comment yet.