Re:Chromium: Add support for Animated PNG
by versteegen on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @06:55PM
(#13880678)
Time-based artifacting? I think you might not be aware that it's not necessary to have a time delay between frames (in fact, time delays and animations are actually a Netscape extension to the format!) In fact breaking a frame up into multiple pieces with different bounding boxes is a compression technique used to reduce the amount of zero bytes that need to be encoded/compressed. ImageMagick and gifsicle will do this.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Chromium: Add support for Animated PNG
by Dylan16807 on Thursday March 16, 2017 @02:51AM
(#13883072)
If you set the delay between frames to 0 or 1 hundredths of a second, browsers will assume it's a mistake and bump it up, usually to 10. The fastest you can actually make the delay is 2/100 of a second. There's no way to have multiple frames show up simultaneously.
Re:Chromium: Add support for Animated PNG
by andrewshadura on Thursday March 16, 2017 @07:52AM
(#13884249)
There was a true-colour GIF using more than 256 colours using this technique.
Re:Chromium: Add support for Animated PNG
by Dylan16807 on Thursday March 16, 2017 @05:20PM
(#13889301)
Sure. It works eventually, but it causes distortion as the frames layer over each other with very visible delays.